German rights organisation Digitalcourage together with its Czech partner organisation IURE and the Polish Panoptykon Foundation have “strongly criticized” the planned preventive automatic facial recognition in the border region of the German federal state of Saxony, the Czech Republic and Poland.Digitalcourage has published a statement in which its criticize the “course of surveillance politics currently pursued by the governing CDU/SPD coalition in Saxony”.”Digitalcourage especially warns about the planned use of covert agents and machine guns, the concept of “abstract danger”, the fact that contacts and companions are affected, and about the planned preventive surveillance of all telecommunication”.In a statement, Digitalcourage criticizes, among other things, the planned new Saxon police law, titled “Use of technical means in order to prevent serious cross-border crime”:”The planned border surveillance places large parts of Saxony under some sort of state of emergency, and it is an statement of distrust toward our Czech and Polish neighbours,” Digitalcourage's Friedemann Ebelt says. “Paragraph 12 of the Saxon Constitution requires that we work together across the borders – not to police them with automated preventive systems.”IuRe, together with representatives from the Czech Pirate Party, has announced they will consult on the matter with their Minister of Foreign Affairs, Tomáš Petříček.”From the point of view of Czech citizens, we perceive the plans for camera systems along the border and 30 km into Germany as a threat. (ߪ) Even if the stated goal is to fight cross-border crime, we should not overlook the fact that it is a major violation of the rights of everyone who crosses the border,” says IuRe lawyer Jan Vobořil in a press release (translation by Digitalcourage).”The use of facial recognition systems means that every person is treated as potentially suspect. These plans signal a lack of trust between Polish and German police officers,” says Wojciech Klicki, legal analyst at the Polish Panoptykon Foundation. “The recording of personal data is only justifiable in concrete and justified individual cases. In any other situation, these kind of systems are essentially nothing but mass surveillance of the local population and of commuters from Poland.””Digitalcourage observes with great concern that with these changes, the Saxon Judiciary and Police will take on characteristics of a preventive state,” says Friedemann Ebelt from Digitalcourage. “With the planned preventive video surveillance and monitoring of telecommunication, including the authority to process those data, the focus of police work will shift from investigating to surveillance.”
Recent Articles
- Bumble data leaked to dark web site
- Vietnam grasps cybersecurity directive, Philippines drops ID verification plans
- UIDAI launches Aadhaar app, enables digital ID storage in Google Wallet
- De La Rue’s strategic Canadian deal to finally win British passports tender
- Meet with Goldman Sachs, Huawei, the European Commission, The World Bank and more!
Recent Video
- New non-profit trade association of HAND will standardise global talent ID
- No cards, no phones: J.P. Morgan’s biometric revolution in payments
- Anthony Vidiano on building the future of access management
- Charisma Check wins 2025 Start-Up Pitching Competition, advancing identity verification and background checks for dating app users
- How to protect one billion Amazon customers: Lessons from continuous risk assessments
